Showing posts with label humanae-vitae. Show all posts
Showing posts with label humanae-vitae. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Feedback to "Overwhelming case for the RH Bill"
Dear Editor,
I must admit that I was "overwhelmed" when I read the article "Overwhelming case for the RH Bill" (PDI, 13 October 2012). It presented so many points aimed at either dismissing the claims of pro-life opposers of RH Bill or bolster the "purported" legitimacy and timeliness of the Bill.
But after several calm and peaceful re-reading of the article, my feeling of "shock and awe" fizzled-out. I came to see the article and RH Bill for what it really is.
Please allow me to convey my opinion.
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
I like your 17 September PDI article
Dear Mr. Nery,
I stumbled-upon your article "What if the Church is in error?" in the Philippine Daily Inquirer (PDI, 17 September 2012). I like your style of condescending with the anti-RH position.
However, I was intrigued by one of your last statements:
I stumbled-upon your article "What if the Church is in error?" in the Philippine Daily Inquirer (PDI, 17 September 2012). I like your style of condescending with the anti-RH position.
However, I was intrigued by one of your last statements:
"Will the Church’s current view of artificial contraception as intrinsically evil be revealed, under the aspect of eternity, to be an unfortunate error?"
Labels:
contraception,
humanae-vitae,
infallibility,
john-nery,
john-paul-ii,
karol-wojtyla,
paul-vi
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)